Weekly Debate

Member_benifits

Bob Lefsetz's opinions on sound quality - is he right?

 

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this blog are submitted by individuals and in no way represent the official position of the Music Producers Guild (UK), which cannot accept responsibility thereof.

Posted on January 13, 2012 @ 10:38 AM most recent comment at January 29, 2012 @ 08:40 PM

Read Bob Lefsetz's blog on Sound Quality here and let us know what you think by replying on this page.

Comments (5)
Bwcool_mini
posted about 1 month ago by SaturdayNightWeaver
From a professional point of view I agree but when I think back to how I used to listen to records and cassettes in the 60/70's I think there is now a *big improvement (read my additional comment below) and yet how could we still appreciate the quality of the production back then with such inferior equipment? maybe the music/songs also played a large part in the equation.

*Considering the advances made in technology over the past 40 years
ie:1. Software...with Melodyne we can now take a not from a recorded chord or a vocal harmony and change it.
2. Computer technology... just look at our current Macs/Keyboards etc.

Why are current recordings not mind-blowing productions? Look at the ratio of improvement does anyone think this is reflected in present day recordings?

George_studio_3_mini
posted about 1 month ago by GeorgeGlennon
Hey Blue, I'm glad you commented on this. You are one that knows first hand how great the musicians/songs /arrangements were back then. Funny because I was recently listening to Fanny by the Bee Gees and commenting in studio to anyone that would listen to me on how great that arrangement builds and how it could be applied in the context of today's pop music. You rarely see that today, and I would like to see more of it of course.
Can I bring that into a commercially viable song today and bridge the gap between art and commerce? And will the kids buy it if I do? Maybe.

Many popular songs today are patch-worked together by people that aren't necessarily musicians, and this of course is allowed by technology. I suppose if we had all the technology available today AND the chops that were required in the old days then there would be mind blowing productions. I'm sure there are some out there, but alas!

Then of course is the white noise slam flat-lining that is a trademark of mastering in 2012. I had a pop track that required a really delicate piano with tremendous dynamics. We even tried out several grand pianos to get it right, and when the track came back from mastering it didn't even sound like the same song. I just burned the original PT-HD tracks to a CD-R and sent it to publishing as is so they could here it as I recorded it with full dynamics of the Steinway.

So I would say there are many factors but the ratio of technological improvement is generally not reflected at least in current pop. There certainly isn't a major label that is going to allow experimentation in 2012, which contributes to the quality malaise. Remember when there was one producer for an album. Now there are twenty. I wonder what Arif would think about that. That's another thing contributing to the non cohesiveness of an album today and hence a production that is not mind blowing. (very few exceptions aside).

All the young music consumers I know would not know a stereo (Proper) as in what Bob is speaking about. Remember stereo stores? Those kids listen to music through ear-buds. But I'll tell you something. Anytime I introduce a young person to the Beatles/Beach Boys/Bacharach/ Paul Simon...they will inevitably recognize the quality of it.......so I guess there is hope at least for quality songs.

Love to hear about on those days at Criteria, Blue! Know that my generation hold you in the highest regard.
Profile_mini
posted about 1 month ago by dniproductions
There's no arguing that the experience offered by earbuds just sucks and that most who listen to music this way are just fine with the experience because they haven't had the opportunity of listening to well recorded and produced music through high quality gear. What I do see is more and more peeps out there wearing full headsets instead of earbuds. Ok, so they're not spending £300 plus on some kick ass senns but I guess they're getting it. Seriously even a move from earbuds to a £30 pair of fulls is such a massive lift in the audio experience and most of the kids I know now use them.

The thing I'm not sure about is if producers should take on the public mantle and become the evangelists of the end user listening experience. In my view that's the MI's job, they have the weight and the commercial incentive. They should lobby Apple, Senn, Bose and other audio experience manufacturers to educate and make the joy of listening to music through the best gear possible sexy and even necessary if you want to be transported as the artist and producer intended and at an affordable price.
Fgallery3-5_copy_mini
posted about 1 month ago by teepee
Generally speaking - I have found that good mixes done on a good monitoring system and properly mastered sound just as good on headphones and ear buds and mostly survive the ssault of mp3.

The reverse however would not seem to be the case!
 
posted 25 days ago by Valdera
report writers could you tell me, Bob Lefsetz is an American music industry figure and author of the email newsletter and blog, the Lefsetz Letter, right?)
Add a comment about this post

(will not be displayed)


The MPG regrets the necessity for this anti-spam requirement – please bear with us. It only takes a minute to complete, and your details will never be used for commercial purposes or market research.

Join our mailing list for the latest updates

Follow the MPG View MPG's profile on LinkedIn
Members' current projects
Featured Studios
Membership Information
Twitter Updates